منابع مشابه
Ambiguity in argument
The use of ambiguous expressions in argumentative dialogues can lead to misunderstanding and equivocation. Such ambiguities are here called active ambiguities. However, even a normative model of persuasion dialogue ought not to ban active ambiguities altogether, one reason being that it is not always possible to determine beforehand which expressions will prove to be actively ambiguous. Thus, i...
متن کامل1 Ambiguity in Argument preprint Jan
The use of ambiguous expressions in argumentative dialogues can lead to misunderstanding and equivocation. However, even a normative model for reasonable and critical discussion ought not to ban such active ambiguities altogether, one reason being that it cannot always be determined beforehand what expressions will turn out to be actively ambiguous. Instead, it will be proposed that the rules f...
متن کاملGenitives, relational nouns, and argument-modifier ambiguity
The argument-modifier distinction is less clear i n NPs than in VPs since nouns do not typically take arguments. The clearest cases of arguments in NPs are found in certain kinds of nominalizations which retain some “verbal” properties (Grimshaw 1990). The status of apparent arguments of non-deverbal relational nouns like sister is more controversial. Genitive constructions like John’s teacher,...
متن کاملUr Scholarship Repository Is ' Argument' Subject to the Product/process Ambiguity? Is 'argument' Subject to the Product/process Ambiguity?
The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that, regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments, arguments are not the product of some process of arguing. Hence, appeal to the distinction is distorting the very organizational foundations of argumentation theory and should be abandoned. Resu...
متن کاملIs ‘argument’ subject to the product/process ambiguity?
The product/process distinction with regards to “argument” has a longstanding history and foundational role in argumentation theory. I shall argue that, regardless of one’s chosen ontology of arguments, arguments are not the product of some process of arguing. Hence, appeal to the distinction is distorting the very organizational foundations of argumentation theory and should be abandoned. Resu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argument & Computation
سال: 2010
ISSN: 1946-2166,1946-2174
DOI: 10.1080/19462166.2010.486480